Sullivan County Funding Corporation
Procurement Report – FY 2014
- Does the Authority have procurement guidelines? Yes
- Are the procurement guidelines reviewed annually, amended as needed, and approved by the Board? Yes
- Does the Authority allow for exceptions to the procurement guidelines? Yes
- Does the Authority assign credit cards to employees for travel and/or business travel? No
- Does the Authority require prospective bidders to sign a non-collusion agreement? Yes
- Does the Authority incorporate a summary of its procurement policies and prohibitions in its solicitations of proposals, bid documents, or specifications for procurement contracts? Yes
- Did the Authority designate a person to serve as the authorized contact on a specific procurement, in accordance with Section 139-j (2)(a) of the State Finance Law, “The Procurement Lobbying Act”? Yes
- Did the Authority determine that a vendor had impermissible contact during a procurement or attempted to influence the procurement during the reporting period, in accordance with Section 139-j (10) of the State Finance Law? No
- Does the Authority have a process to review and investigate allegations of impermissible contact during a procurement and to impose sanctions in instances where violations have occurred, in accordance with Section 139-j (9) of the State Finance Law? Yes
The Authority paid the County of Sullivan Industrial Development Agency $40,000 in 2014 to conduct its administrative duties.
##